Post #1- Technical Writing Defined
In order for me to define "technical writing," my definitions of each term should be defined.
I interpret anything that can be described as "technical" to be more in-tune with the small parts of the idea. It is more methodical, with either the "right" way or the "wrong" way. It isn't involved in much interpretation. In my head, the concept of a "yes or no question" is the same general concept of anything involved in "technical" terms; very basic and to-the-point.
I am very fond of writing, and find myself doing it VERY often, but to define the word is a little difficult for me. Literally, "writing" as a verb would be defined as “to write” (obviously), but I was told never to use the word you're defining in the definition. More generally, "writing" (and again, this is my own personal definition) is an expression, or way of expression. It’s a way of portraying ideas, facts, beliefs, anything up to food recipes, so that your thoughts are apparent to other people. Writing is talking without voice. Unlike my concept of the term "technical", the term "writing" is very much dependent on interpretation. Some writing, such as facts or instructions, can't have much interpretation, but literature is completely dependent on how you comprehend what you've read. If I wrote "one must be empty in order to feel full", one could comprehend what I said as 'I have to go without everything in order to understand what truly fulfills me' or more literally 'If I go without eating until I'm starved, then I will understand the true feeling of "fullness" when I eat again.' Obviously these are two completely different ideas, which is why writing is very involved with interpretation.
Hopefully, I will make it into
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home