Response to Collaborative Post

The points I thought were particularly important was the part on being “specific,” I think that this is very important when talking about technical writing. Technical writing does need to be clear and concise, so the fact that it is specific makes it easy to understand. I do not really disagree with anything you guys said about technical writing but the “fluff” part, do you mean exaggerations or just added words, I guess I did not really understand that part. However, the one point I would like to expand upon on was the fact you mentioned that it is structured; I believe that it is as well. Technical writing should be structured, it makes technical writing what it is, I mean understanding the facts and such make it easier to understand and when it is placed neatly in front of you like that, you tend to get it better and/or identify with the writing better.